
The Polestar 2 is rated 314 miles on the EPA test, the Tesla Model 3 363. A 10–80% stop takes 32 minutes in the Polestar 2 and 28 in the Tesla Model 3. Every figure below names the version of the car it belongs to, and the three tools further down turn the same numbers into a charging race, a road trip and a yearly bill.
At a glance
Polestar 2 · 2 Single Motor (19 Inch Wheels)
314mi EPA
32min 10–80%
Tesla Model 3 · Model 3 Premium RWD
363mi EPA
28min 10–80%
$36,990from
The short answer
The Tesla Model 3 turns the same electricity into more miles.
The Tesla Model 3 is rated 363 miles against 314 — 49 miles, 16% further. It uses 29.6 kWh to cover 100 miles where the Tesla Model 3 needs 24.6.
A 10–80% stop takes 28 minutes in the Tesla Model 3 and 32 in the Polestar 2. On a 50 kW post it is 66 and 66 minutes, so most of the advantage disappears at a slow site.
The Polestar 2 is rated to tow 3,307 lb against 2,205 lb.
Which one, in one line
Pick the Tesla Model 3 ifit wins on range (363 mi against 314), running cost (24.6 kWh per 100 miles against 29.6), charging (28 minutes against 32).
The priceThe Tesla Model 3 is the cheaper to buy, listed from $36,990; both are US list prices before tax, delivery and incentives.


Charging, raced
Two cars, one post, same clock
Charging speed is a station number and a car number, and the smaller one wins. Set the post and both cars fill against the same clock — the interesting part is not who wins, it is how much of the gap a slow post takes away.
Each car is modelled on its own published 10–80% time, which gives an average power over that window: 104 kW for the Polestar 2, 118 kW for the Tesla Model 3. A post above that average changes nothing; a post below it sets the pace.
At 150 kW, going from 10% to 80% takes 32 min in the Polestar 2 and 28 min in the Tesla Model 3 — a gap of 4 minutes. Both cars are limited by their own packs at this post, so a bigger one would change nothing.
Every figure
The numbers, with the version attached
A tick marks a figure that is simply more useful — more range, less energy per mile, a faster stop. Rows without a tick are different, not better: a bigger battery, a longer wheelbase and a wider body are all trades, and this page does not pretend otherwise.
| Measure | Polestar 2 | Tesla Model 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Range and efficiency | ||
| EPA range | 314 mi2025 2 Single Motor (19 Inch Wheels) | 363 mi✓2026 Model 3 Premium RWD |
| EPA efficiency | 3.37 mi/kWh | 4.06 mi/kWh✓ |
| Energy per 100 miles | 29.6 kWh | 24.6 kWh✓ |
| Battery, usable | 79 kWhPolestar 2 Long Range Dual Motor (MY25) | 79 kWhTesla Model 3 Long Range AWD (Highland) |
| Range left in the cold | 57%modelled envelope | 57%modelled envelope |
| Charging | ||
| DC peak | 207 kW | 250 kW✓ |
| 10–80% at peak | 32 min | 28 min✓ |
| Average power, 10–80%(derived) | 104 kW | 118 kW✓ |
| AC maximum | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Full charge on 240 V | 8 h✓ | 11.7 h |
| Fast-charge plug | CCS1 | NACS |
| Size and weight | ||
| Length | 181.3 in | 185.8 in |
| Width with mirrors | 78.1 in | 82.2 in |
| Height | 58.2 in | 56.7 in |
| Wheelbase | 107.7 in | 113.2 in |
| Kerb weight | 4,813 lb | 4,187 lb |
| Space and practicality | ||
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Boot, seats up | 14.4 cu ft | 21 cu ft✓ |
| Front trunk | 1.4 cu ft | 3.1 cu ft✓ |
| Maximum cargo | 38.7 cu ft✓ | 34.5 cu ft |
| Towing, braked | 3,307 lb✓ | 2,205 lb |
| Heat pump | Standard Equipment | Standard Equipment |
| Performance and safety | ||
| Power | 310 kW | 366 kW✓ |
| 0–100 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.4 s✓ |
| Euro NCAP stars | 5 | 5 |
| Battery warranty | 8 years / 99,419 mi8 years / 160,000 km | 8 years / 119,303 mi8 years / 192,000 km |
| V2L / V2H | Not supported | Not supported |
| Price | ||
| Starts at | —US list price | $36,990US list price |
| Top version | — | $54,990 |
| Per mile of range | —cheapest version | $115cheapest version |
How to read the mixed rows. Range and efficiency come from one EPA row — the longest-range version of each car's current model year, not the longest range it has ever been rated at. Battery, charging and the catalogue dimensions come from the catalogue's headline record, which is not always the same trim. Each of those rows names its trim where the two disagree, and the model pages carry the full per-trim table.
What the cold row is not. “Range left in the cold” is the catalogue's modelled cold-highway figure as a share of its mild-urban one — a European model, not an EPA test in US weather. It is shown as a share rather than in miles so it cannot be mistaken for a US range rating.
Euro NCAP is the European crash programme; NHTSA and IIHS ratings are not in this dataset and are not claimed here. Warranty terms are the catalogue's kilometre figures converted to miles, so read them as indicative until a US warranty source replaces them.
Your numbers
What this pair costs you, on your drive
Two questions decide most purchases: how often you stop, and what the year costs. Both are arithmetic on the figures above, so change the inputs and the answer changes with you.
The drive
Starts full, arrives at 10%, charges back to 80% at each stop, and assumes a highway range of 85% of the EPA figure.
- Polestar 2
- 2
- Tesla Model 3
- 2
stops · 64 min charging
stops · 56 min charging
The year
Energy at the wheels from the EPA label, priced at the tariff you pay. Home charging is usually cheaper than the directory's median.
- Polestar 2
- $1,245
- Tesla Model 3
- $1,035
$10 per 100 mi
$9 per 100 mi
The trip model ignores charger detours, queueing and the last 10% of the pack, which is slow on both cars. The yearly cost is energy only: no session fees, no idle fees, no home-charger installation, and no petrol car to compare against.
Your priorities
A verdict you can argue with
There is no single winner, only a winner for a set of priorities. Move the sliders and the weighting changes — nothing here is a magazine score, and the page never hides the numbers it is built from.
Weighted result
Tesla Model 3
wins 5 of 6 measures on these weights
Each measure is scaled between the two cars, so a weight of 5 means “this is the thing I care about” and 0 means “I do not care at all”. The scores are relative, not a rating out of ten.
Questions
Short answers, then the reasoning
Every figure here comes from the same data as the rest of the page. Where the data cannot answer, the page says so instead of guessing.
Still unsure about a term? The charging glossary covers the rest of them.
Which has more range, the Polestar 2 or the Tesla Model 3?
The Tesla Model 3. The Polestar 2 is rated 314 miles and the Tesla Model 3 363, each on the longest-range version of its current model year — 2025 2 Single Motor (19 Inch Wheels) and 2026 Model 3 Premium RWD respectively. EPA figures are lab scores from one standard test, not a promise for a cold morning or a steady 75 mph.
Which charges faster?
The Tesla Model 3. Going from 10% to 80% takes 32 minutes in the Polestar 2 (207 kW peak) and 28 in the Tesla Model 3 (250 kW peak). At a slow post the station becomes the limit and the gap narrows, because the slower car is short of power rather than short of time.
Do they use the same plug?
No. The Polestar 2 fast-charges on CCS1 and takes J1772 for AC; the Tesla Model 3 uses NACS and NACS for AC. An adapter can bridge the shape of the plug; it cannot change the power either car will accept or what a station will supply.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Tesla Model 3, by about $600.34 a year at 12,000 miles and $0.35 per kWh. It uses 24.6 kWh per 100 miles against 29.6. That is energy only, at the wheels: session fees, idle fees and home-charger installation are not in it.
Which has more space?
The Tesla Model 3: 14.4 cu ft of boot against 21 cu ft. Boot volumes are measured by different conventions between makers, so read the direction as reliable and the exact size of the gap as indicative.
Which is cheaper to buy?
The Tesla Model 3 has a published US list price, from $36,990.00; the Polestar 2 has no US price in the sheet yet, so only one side can be compared.
Other comparisons
All comparisonsEvery figure on this page comes from the same records the Polestar 2 and Tesla Model 3 pages use. How the sources are chosen, and what a figure here never claims, is on the methodology page.
